Utah Record
Alpine
Zoning

Scenic Ridgeline and View Protection Ordinance

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Concerned (5)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
10
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 3, 2026.

Public comments (10)

SupportiveBill McGeeFeb 3, 2026

Stated that he helped write the proposed ordinance, drawing from other cities like Park City and Sedona to focus on observable conditions and a 20% visual change baseline rather than opinion.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 12:28 →
ConcernedJeff GutfieldFeb 3, 2026

Asked the planning commission how the proposed view restrictions would actually be enforced after a building plan is approved.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 14:58 →
ConcernedJames LawrenceFeb 3, 2026

Expressed frustration with lack of consistency on Main Street and noted his own building plans have been pending for three years while waiting for the Main Street plan.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 15:39 →
SupportiveAllie GarberoFeb 3, 2026

Expressed support for homeowners considering their neighbors' views when building large structures that block scenic east bench views.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 19:15 →
SupportiveAndrew YoungFeb 3, 2026

Spoke as a resident and council member about the historical significance of Alpine's views, explaining that the ordinance was proposed to address resident complaints regarding blocked views and inadequate existing height and grade rules.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 20:29 →
NeutralCraig SkidmoreFeb 3, 2026

Praised the city's hillside protection ordinance but noted concerns about enforcement, vegetation growth, and neighbor-to-neighbor view obstructions.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 31:28 →
ConcernedDean BarneyFeb 3, 2026

Expressed frustration over large neighboring structures and exceptions granted over time, calling for stricter enforcement of existing setbacks rather than new rules.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 34:25 →
ConcernedConstance GoeckeritzFeb 3, 2026

Expressed heartbreak over massive garages and lost views in her neighborhood, supporting earth-tone paint requirements and raising a separate concern about items removed from her husband's grave at the cemetery.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 40:00 →
SupportiveJohn NashFeb 3, 2026

Supported the proposed ordinance to prevent older in-town homes from being replaced by massive monoliths that destroy community views.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 47:00 →
ConcernedSheryl DameFeb 3, 2026

Raised concerns about intrusive lighting, bright holiday lights, and hillside illumination affecting wildlife and night skies.

Planning Commission - Feb 3, 2026 · 53:30 →