Zoning
Highland Mains signage amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)Neutral (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 26, 2026.
Public comments (2)
NeutralDoug CortneyMay 26, 2026
Council Member Cortney, speaking as a resident, pointed out that the agenda packet already specifies a black background with white letters (monochrome) and that the sign material is aluminum with a wood-look finish, not actual wood.
Planning Commission. — May 26, 2026 · 33:02 →OpposedLiz RiceMay 26, 2026
Resident Liz Rice said taller signs on SR-92 actually become invisible 'white noise' at driving speeds — she notices the lower ones more — and she likes the stone base.
Planning Commission. — May 26, 2026 · 34:03 →