Zoning

Highland Mains signage amendment

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 26, 2026.

Public comments (2)

NeutralDoug CortneyMay 26, 2026

Council Member Cortney, speaking as a resident, pointed out that the agenda packet already specifies a black background with white letters (monochrome) and that the sign material is aluminum with a wood-look finish, not actual wood.

Planning Commission. — May 26, 2026 · 33:02 →
OpposedLiz RiceMay 26, 2026

Resident Liz Rice said taller signs on SR-92 actually become invisible 'white noise' at driving speeds — she notices the lower ones more — and she likes the stone base.

Planning Commission. — May 26, 2026 · 34:03 →