Library tax increase
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Alternatives to the tax increase→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Library board member praised the library's value and the council's support for the dedicated tax increase.
City Council — June 16, 2026 · 8:44 →Friends of the Library board member supported the tax, citing Libby costs, kids' programs, and the library's low cost per household.
City Council — June 16, 2026 · 11:31 →Wholeheartedly supports the $30/year library tax, calling the library an investment in youth, adults, and seniors.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 12:01 →Read supportive letters about the library from neighbors and submitted additional written comments.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 12:49 →Library board vice chair urged the council to keep the library 'built to last' and thanked them for pursuing the funding.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 2:14:16 →A young resident who said she loves the library and supports the tax.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 2:17:00 →Shared a supportive email from another resident and described the library as a lifeline for young families.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 2:18:36 →Supported the library for students who need it and worried that moving PI park-watering costs into the general fund would blur fee-versus-tax clarity.
City Council. — May 5, 2026 · 2:31:21 →