Topics getting the most attention in Logan public meetings, ranked by how frequently they are discussed.
11 issues with critical priority
Logan's City Council is shaking up development rules, especially near rivers. They also rejected a big project for the old mall site, so expect changes in what gets built and where.
Logan City is asking for your input on upcoming road improvements for Canyon Road. They've put out a survey, so if you use this road, now's your chance to help shape its future.
The council approved a long-term power pooling agreement with UAMPS, which is expected to provide cost efficiencies and ensure reliable public power services for the city.
North Logan thinks Logan City is hogging tax money that should be theirs. They're cooking up a plan to get their fair share back, so get ready for some potential changes to how taxes are collected and distributed.
The city is investing $50 million into a new water tank and lines to ensure residents have reliable water pressure and fire safety.
The city is shifting how your tax dollars are collected to fund local fire services. While the city's rate is going up, the county's rate is going down, so your total bill shouldn't change.
Logan's shelling out a whopping $54 million to spruce up city buildings and services. Get ready for some major upgrades that could change how you interact with your city!
Get ready for some road work on Canyon Road! Logan City is kicking off an improvement project, so expect detours and delays as they upgrade this important route.
Logan's planning commission is considering tweaking rules about how close buildings can get to the Logan River. Some residents are concerned these changes could negatively impact the river's health and future.
Logan City just banned camping in public spots, and this new rule is a big deal for how the city handles homelessness. Expect changes in how they support or manage people without homes.
Think you've been discriminated against at work in Logan? Good news, the state says Grand County officials didn't discriminate against former employees. The investigation found no real proof of the claims.