Katrice MacKay
No biography on file yet.
Contact
Voice
- Meetings spoken in
- 88
- Total speaking time
- 8:55:22
- Avg per meeting
- 6:05
- Segments
- 10876
Want every word MacKay has said?
The OpenCity MCP for Claude.ai answers questions like “what has MacKay said about housing this year” with one prompt — full speaking history, with YouTube timestamps.
Voice summary
Citywide I Council Member Katrice MacKay on the recordAI-generated · 20 meetingsCouncil Member Katrice MacKay has consistently prioritized fiscal oversight, public transparency, and context-driven economic development throughout her recent tenure. She frequently scrutinizes municipal budgets and administrative proposals, notably questioning expenditures in the airport and police departments, while advocating for the use of external consultants to avoid 'boilerplate' solutions. MacKay has demonstrated a strong commitment to representing constituent interests, evidenced by her firm opposition to selling public park land and her proactive engagement with neighborhood infrastructure, such as safety standards for crosswalks and residential traffic concerns. Furthermore, she maintains an active role in administrative governance, consistently voting to confirm mayoral appointments and supporting initiatives aimed at enhancing city public safety and resource management.
Top issues during term (20)(Development)
Franklin Neighborhood Residential Infill and Condominium Development
Impacts private property value and infrastructure demand in the Franklin Neighborhood.
Hillside Development and Geologic Hazards
Development on these lots involves high engineering and geotechnical costs.
Student Housing and Parking Ratios at 910 North 900 East
Private investment in student housing redevelopment with potential municipal costs related to neighborhood parking enforcement.
Proposed Riverbottoms Residential Development
Subdivision development impacts local infrastructure and municipal service delivery costs.
Lakeview Fields Subdivision Rezone
Private investment in single-family residential infrastructure.
Spring Creek Neighborhood Townhome and Warehouse Projects
Private investment with anticipated unit sale prices between $430,000 and $450,000.
Maeser Neighborhood Townhome Development
Property values may be affected by new residential infill, but no direct municipal expenditures are required.
Rental Housing Standards
Rental dwelling license fees fund city inspection programs.
North Timpview Residential Growth
Subdivision development impacts local infrastructure and municipal service delivery costs.
Conservation Easements
Conserve Utah Valley is fundraising $10,000 to cover stewardship costs for Utah Open Lands.
Epic Sports Park Development
Details on project costs were part of the staff report.
North Timpview Entertainment Development
The project is projected to generate a net fiscal benefit of $2.3 million annually for Provo.
Accessory Building Size Limits
The owner may face costs to relocate or demolish the structure.
Historic Home Restoration and Balcony Addition
The applicant is responsible for the costs of restoration and providing detailed architectural plans.
Data Center Development in East Bay
Unquantified impacts on future industrial utility revenues and economic development opportunities.
Historic Snow House Adaptive Reuse and Restaurant Conversion
Private commercial investment in a historic downtown property.
Neighborhood Traffic and Access
The new pedestrian buttons alone cost $16,000.
Wymount Terrace Parking and Redevelopment
Parking spaces will carry separate rental fees, potentially influencing vehicle ownership rates and tenant leasing costs.
Moved or seconded (23)
Motions MacKay personally put forward or seconded. Attribution comes from the minutes; where the minutes name somebody we cannot match to the roster we leave it out rather than guess, so this is a floor, not a total.
- secondedpassed 7-02026-04-28
Slate Canyon Conservation Easement
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- movedpassed 4-22026-04-28
Council Chair MacKay moved to advance the ordinance to a night meeting for adoption.
- secondedpassed 6-02026-03-10
bring the ordinance to the March 24, 2026 Council meeting
- secondedpassed2026-01-27
formally approve the priorities under Item 4 as written, with the addition of the word “residential” as discussed
- secondedpassed2025-11-11
Split Carterville Neighborhood
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- movedpassed 5-02025-10-21
Amendment to Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- movedpassed 7-02025-09-23
to repeal the entirety of Section 14.30.040
- moved2025-09-23
to start with the Rock Canyon Park ASAP, and then start working on the design for the Lakeview Parkway Park
- secondedpassed 7-02025-09-09
Removal of Confusing Text in Owner-Occupant Definition
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- secondedpassed 7-02025-09-09
Request for Staff Proposal on Special Use Permits
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- secondedpassed 5-22025-08-19
Councilor Bogdin made a motion to remove the November 17 meeting citing reduced activity around the holidays. Seconded by Councilor MacKay.
- movedpassed 5-02025-06-17
Advance business license fee discussions and approve rental base fees
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- secondedpassed 5-12025-06-17
rejecting the Planning Commission’s suggestions on transportation innovation zones and the extension of the 600 South bike lane
- movedpassed 6-02025-05-06
Councilor MacKay moved to close the meeting.
- secondedpassed 6-02025-05-06
adopt the proposed handbook update to incorporate the Stormwater Service District section
- movedpassed 6-02025-04-08
adopt this recommendation at the April 22nd Regular Meeting
- secondedpassed 6-02025-04-08
Data Center Policy Development
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
- movedpassed 5-12025-04-08
Councilor MacKay made a motion to approve the implied motion, with an amendment to the development agreement to include a 50-foot setback requirement.
- movedpassed 6-02025-04-08
Councilor MacKay made a motion, seconded by Councilor Handley, to strike Section 5.08.060(ii) (line 34) of the proposed ordinance and consider the revised version at the April 22nd…
- movedpassed 7-02025-03-25
Elderly Persons Extra Living Space Code
Title matched to the agenda, not quoted from the motion
Decisions during term (15)
Recorded while MacKay was in office — not necessarily decisions they moved, spoke to, or voted on.
Redevelopment Agency Budget for FY 2027
Project Plan Approval for Brighton Development Townhomes
Ordinance Text Amendment to Floodplain Management and Development Standards
***CONTINUED*** Development Services requests an Ordinance Text Amendment to Provo City Code 15.24.030 to amend the area requirement for agriculture protection areas. Citywide Application. Jessica Dahneke (801) 852-6413 jdahneke@provo.gov…
Resolution tentatively adopting a proposed budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Provo City
General Plan Map Amendment for Provo Towne Centre Redevelopment
Concept Plan Continuance for Provo Towne Centre Mixed-Use Redevelopment
Substitute Motion to Continue 2026 Development Standards Ordinance
Voting record (14)(Development)
Oldest to newest — hover a bar for the item.
Redevelopment Agency Budget for FY 2027
Resolution tentatively adopting a proposed budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Provo City
Appropriation for Economic Development Study
Councilor Garrett made a substitute motion to continue the item and requested that staff explore the possibility of creating exceptions to allow 24' roads for the purpose of redevelopment or infill.
Substitute Motion to Continue 2026 Development Standards Ordinance
Ordinance Amending Provo City Code Regarding Sensitive Lands Development
Redevelopment Agency Development Agreement with Nilson Homes
Amendment to Development Agreement for 1069 North Geneva Road
Redevelopment Agency Survey Area Designation for Lakeview Parkway
Zone Map Amendment and Development Agreement for 1050 West 100 North (Dixon Neighborhood)
Believes changing zones is a major decision and worries about setting an undesirable precedent.