Utah Record
Summit County
CR

Chris Robinson

District 4 Council Member (Seat D)January 2009 to January 2027

About

Chris Robinson's platform centers on addressing growth pressures in Summit County by finding collaborative and common-ground solutions.

Campaign promises (1)

  • development
    Seek to find common ground in managing growth pressures within Summit County.
    Related votes

At a glance

News mentions
0

Term ending Jan 1, 2027.

Voice

Meetings spoken in
5
Total speaking time
1:20
Avg per meeting
0:16
Segments
66

Want every word Robinson has said?

The OpenCity MCP for Claude.ai answers questions like “what has Robinson said about housing this year” with one prompt — full speaking history, with YouTube timestamps.

Filtered to General

Top issues during term (19)(General)

critical→Aug 2026[22]

Traffic Impact Study Threshold for New Developments

Applicants face traffic study costs estimated around $40,000, alongside county impact fees.

critical→Jul 2026[19]

Lost Creek Community Zone Text Amendment

Substantial long-term public infrastructure costs for fire, police, and road maintenance that could outweigh tax revenues.

high↑Oct 2026[12]

Bond Design Center Commercial Rezone

Private commercial development costs and potential increased commercial property tax valuations for Summit County.

high↑Mar 2026[11]

Park City Senior Center Operations and Facilities

Estimated project costs range from $14.5 million to $16.5 million.

high↑Oct 2026[10]

2027 County Budget and Personnel Additions

Involves multi-million dollar personnel expenditures, new program investments, and departmental funding adjustments across county operations.

high↑Oct 2026[10]

Community Clean Energy Program Launch

Residential customers will see a flat $4 monthly charge, while businesses will pay approximately six-tenths of a cent per kilowatt-hour.

critical↓Sep 2026[7]

Save Our Space: Plan 2063 Solid Waste Action Plan

Avoids an estimated $50 million in future out-of-county waste hauling costs for taxpayers.

critical↑Mar 2026[6]

Solid Waste Master Plan and Landfill Extension

Extending landfill life by 10 years is projected to save approximately $60 million in future waste-hauling expenses.

high↑Oct 2026[5]

municipality law repeal

It could shift administrative and zoning costs, changing how taxpayer money supports new city infrastructure.

high↑Sep 2026[5]

facility permit revocation

Local taxpayers might see shifts in waste collection costs as the county adjusts to losing this facility.

medium↓Aug 2026[2]

street renaming

Property owners and businesses might have to shell out a bit of cash for new stationery, updated marketing materials, and address changes.

medium↓Aug 2026[2]

surveillance technology

Taxpayers could end up footing the bill to constantly repair or replace these vandalized cameras.

medium↓Apr 2026[0]

renewable energy

While upfront investments might be required, this could lower utility bills in the long run.

high↓Jul 2026[0]

city incorporation

Starting a brand new city usually means setting up fresh tax structures and services, which could shake up your local utility and property bills.

medium↓Jun 2026[0]

state-local relations

How well our leaders negotiate could save or cost taxpayers millions in legal battles and infrastructure overhauls tied to massive mixed-use developments.

high↓Jul 2026[0]

data privacy and immigration

There is a risk of taxpayer-funded lawsuits or costly policy overhauls if residents push back against the unauthorized sharing of their personal movements.

medium↓May 2026[0]

public health program

Details on the program's budget weren't specified, but it's funded through local public health allocations.

medium↓Jun 2026[0]

short-term rental regulations

Property owners might face different tax rates or permit fees depending entirely on whether their home sits inside or outside city limits.

high↓Apr 2026[0]

sign code regulation

Businesses might have to shell out extra cash to update or replace non-compliant signs.

Decisions during term (2)

Recorded while Robinson was in office — not necessarily decisions they moved, spoke to, or voted on.

Voting record (0)(General)

No votes found matching General.