We use cookies to understand how you use our site and improve your experience. You can choose which cookies to allow.
See our Privacy Policy and Terms.
The city is looking at whether developers should be forced to build new fences when a neighbor already has one. This could save developers money and prevent 'double-fencing' between properties.
At a glance
Declining — being discussed less frequently. 0 mentions in the last 30 days, 2 the 60 before, 2 the 90 before that.
This could lower construction costs for developers by removing the need for redundant fencing.
Developers and property owners who won't have to deal with unnecessary construction or double-fencing.
None identified.
The city is looking at ways to stop developers from building 'fences within fences' when they build next to existing homes. This creates trash traps and maintenance headaches, so they want to allow for more flexible designs.
The city is looking at ways to stop developers from building new fences right next to existing ones, which creates 'no man's land' areas that collect trash and trap wildlife.
The city is looking at changing rules that force developers to build new fences next to existing ones. This could make it easier to build new apartments while keeping neighborhoods looking consistent.
Developers want an easier way to handle fencing when building next to existing homes. Residents are concerned about who will maintain these fences and whether their property rights are being respected.
Increases housing density in the area with new apartments and townhomes.
This would allow for a cleaner fence line and prevent the creation of narrow, unmaintainable gaps between properties.
This change aims to prevent unnecessary construction of duplicate fences between new apartments and existing houses.
We'll include it in your weekly brief whenever the council takes it up.
The weekly brief for Tooele
Every council decision, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.