Utah Record
Tooele County
Environment

Data Center Land Use Regulations (Chapter 34)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (7)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 12, 2026.

Public comments (9)

ConcernedAnita DaurampalAug 12, 2026

Recommended referencing recognized international standards like ISO/IEC 22237 for data center facilities to ensure public safety and environmental protection.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 2:23 →
OpposedDave GauntmanAug 12, 2026

Expressed deep concern over high water consumption by data centers amid local water shortages and drying lakes.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 5:44 →
OpposedBrittany FieldingAug 12, 2026

Questioned why heavy industrial data centers are proposed in lower-income rural counties and called for a resident vote before approval.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 7:30 →
OpposedNatalie MerriamAug 12, 2026

Called for a 24-month moratorium on data centers, citing statutory compliance, power grid strain, and water depletion risks.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 8:44 →
OpposedJill LowryAug 12, 2026

Shared memories of growing up in Tooele County's desert and made an emotional plea to protect desert ecosystems and water from data center drains.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 12:14 →
OpposedDiane KarnAug 12, 2026

Highlighted declining water levels in local lakes and argued that pushing forward without thorough environmental testing is dangerous.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 13:57 →
OpposedSusan ContrerasAug 12, 2026

Warned about toxic diesel generator emissions, hazardous chemical storage, wastewater brine, and health impacts, demanding an immediate regulatory pause.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 17:14 →
ConcernedMisty KorthAug 12, 2026

Raised concerns about electrical grid reliability, healthcare vulnerability during power outages, and high local baseline health statistics.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 21:39 →
OpposedRose MooreAug 12, 2026

Cited state case law and LUDMA requirements, arguing that data centers constitute a nuisance and chapters allowing them violate public welfare mandates.

Planning Commission Work Meeting · 26:28 →