Interstate 80 Preliminary Subdivision Platt

Expressed concern about piecemeal project approvals and water issues affecting the Great Salt Lake wetlands.

Asked the commission to table the plats, criticized old water rights studies, and questioned Utah Inland Port involvement.

Questioned traffic trip numbers and potential conflicts of interest regarding the developer chairing the public infrastructure district.

Asked for independent verification of water rights and questioned relationships between Burmester Corp, Zenith Development, and Mr. Ackerlow.

Questioned outdated aquatics resource reports, traffic study bias, and potential taxpayer burdens for power infrastructure.

Voiced concern over data center intentions, water service assurances, and developer background.

Highlighted financial importance of the PID receiving property tax differentials and urged further investigation.

Questioned why flex buildings were being presented when boundaries were not fully set.

Shared concerns from the Skull Valley Reservation about water extraction impacting tribal lands and ranchers.

Requested sustainability certifications, fair tax-to-play policies, and adequate infrastructure funding from developers.